{"title": "Anatomical origin and computational role of diversity in the response properties of cortical neurons", "book": "Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems", "page_first": 117, "page_last": 124, "abstract": null, "full_text": "Anatomical origin and  computational role \nof diversity in the response properties of \n\ncortical neurons \n\nKalanit  Grill Spectort \nRafael Malacht \nDepts of t Applied  Mathematics and  Computer Science  and tN eurobiology \n\nShimon Edelmant \n\nThe Weizmann Institute of Science \n\nRehovot  76100,  Israel \n\n{kalanit.edelman. malach }~wisdom . weizmann .ac.il \n\nAbstract \n\nThe  maximization of  diversity  of neuronal  response  properties  has  been \nrecently  suggested  as  an  organizing  principle  for  the  formation  of such \nprominent features of the functional architecture of the brain as the corti(cid:173)\ncal columns and the associated patchy projection patterns (Malach,  1994). \nWe show that (1) maximal diversity is attained when the ratio of dendritic \nand  axonal  arbor  sizes  is  equal  to  one,  as  found  in  many  cortical  areas \nand  across  species  (Lund  et al.,  1993;  Malach,  1994),  and  (2)  that maxi(cid:173)\nmization of diversity leads  to  better  performance  in  systems of receptive \nfields  implementing steerable/shiftable  filters,  and  in  matching spatially \ndistributed  signals,  a  problem that  arises  in  many high-level  visual tasks. \n\n1  Anatomical substrate for  sampling diversity \n\nA  fundamental  feature  of  cortical  architecture  is  its  columnar  organization,  mani(cid:173)\nfested  in  the tendency  of neurons  with similar properties to be organized  in  columns \nthat run perpendicular to the cortical surface.  This organization of the cortex was ini(cid:173)\ntially discovered  by  physiological experiments  (Mouncastle,  1957;  Hubel  and  Wiesel, \n1962),  and  subsequently  confirmed  with  the  demonstration  of histologically  defined \ncolumns.  Tracing  experiments  have  shown  that  axonal  projections  throughout  the \ncerebral  cortex tend to be organized in  vertically  aligned  clusters  or patches.  In  par(cid:173)\nticular,  intrinsic  horizontal  connections  linking neighboring  cortical sites,  which  may \nextend  up  to  2 - 3  mm,  have  a  striking tendency  to  arborize  selectively  in preferred \nsites,  forming  distinct  axonal patches  200 - 300  J.lm  in  diameter. \n\nRecently,  it  has  been  observed  that  the  size  of  these  patches  matches  closely \nthe  average  diameter  of  individual  dendritic  arbors  of  upper-layer  pyramidal  cells \n\n\f118 \n\nKalanit Grill Spector,  Shimon  Edelman, Rafael Malach \n\n.... \n\n2&00 \n\n10(0 \n\n: : \n\n/ '\"  ! \n\n&00 , \n\n~._._._;~ .. _._. r::~ ._. \n\n\\ \n\n~  ~  ~  ~  ~  ~  N \n\n,*,*\".\",p.d hm pa~ \n\n) \n100 \n\nBO \n\n80 \n\n'0 \n\n0:2 \n\n0\" \n\n0 S \n\n0.8 \n\nt \n\n1 :2 \n\n1 .. \n\n1 S \n\nt  IS \n\nr \u2022\u2022 o betiIJMn I'IWI'ot'I  .. d ptIId! \n\nFigure 1:  Left:  histograms of the percentage of patch-originated input to the neurons, \nplotted  for  three  values  of  the  ratio  r  between  the  dendritic  arbor  and  the  patch \ndiameter  (0,5,  1.0,  2.0).  The flattest  histogram is  obtained  for  r  =  1.0  Right:  the \ndi versity  of neuronal  properties  (as  defined  in  section  1)  vs.  r.  The  maximum is \nattained for  r  =  1.0, a  value compatible with the anatomical data. \n\n(see  Malach,  1994,  for  a  review).  Determining  the  functional  significance  of  this \ncorrelation,  which  is  a  fundamental property  that  holds  throughout  various cortical \nareas and across species  (Lund et al.,  1993), may shed  light on  the general principles \nof operation  of  the  cortical  architecture.  One  such  driving  principle  may  be  the \nmaximization of diversity of response  properties in the neuronal population (Malach, \n1994).  According to this hypothesis, matching the sizes of the axonal patches and the \ndendritic  arbors  causes  neighboring  neurons  to  develop  slightly  different  functional \nselectivity  profiles,  resulting  in  an  even  spread  of  response  preferences  across  the \ncortical population, and in an improvement of the brain's ability to process the variety \nof stimuli likely to be encountered  in the environment. 1 \n\nTo test  the  effect  of the  ratio between  axonal patch  and  dendritic  arbor  size  on \nthe  diversity  of the  neuronal  population,  we  conducted  computer simulations based \non anatomical data concerning  patchy projections  (Rockland and Lund,  1982;  Lund \net al.,  1993;  Malach,  1992; Malach et al.,  1993).  The patches were  modeled by disks, \nplaced  at  regular  intervals  of twice  the  patch  diameter,  as  revealed  by  anatomical \nlabeling.  Dendritic arbors were  also modeled by disks,  whose radii were  manipulated \nin different  simulations.  The arbors  were  placed  randomly over  the  axonal patches, \nat a  density  of 10,000 neurons  per patch.  We  then  calculated the amount of patch(cid:173)\nrelated information sampled by each neuron,  defined to be proportional to the area of \noverlap of the dendritic  tree  and  the patch.  The results  of the  calculations for  three \n\n1 Necessary conditions for  obtaining dendritic sampling diversity are that dendritic arbors cross \nfreely through column borders,  and that dendrites which  cross column borders sample with equal \nprobability from patch and inter-patch compartments.  These assumptions were shown to  be valid \nin (Malach, 1992; Malach, 1994). \n\n\fDiversity  in  the  Response  Properties  of Cortical Neurons \n\n119 \n\nvalues of the  ratio of patch  and arbor diameters appear in  Figure  1. \n\nThe presence  of two  peaks in  the  histogram obtained  with  the  arbor/patch  ratio \nr  =  0.5  indicates  that  two  dominant groups  are  formed  in  the  population,  the  first \nreceiving  most  of its  input  from  the  patch,  and  the  second  - from  the  inter-patch \nsources.  A value of r  = 2.0, for  which the dendritic arbors are larger than the axonal \npatch  size,  yields  near  uniformity of sampling  properties,  with  most of the  neurons \nreceiving  mostly  patch-originated  input ,  as  apparent  from  the  single  large  peak  in \nthe  histogram.  To  quantify  the  notion  of diversity,  we  defined  it  as  diversity  \"'< \nI ~; I > -1, where  n(p)  is  the  number of neurons  that receive  p percent  of their  inputs \nfrom  the  patch,  and  <  . >  denotes  average  over  p.  Figure  1,  right,  shows  that \ndiversity  is  maximized  when  the  size  of  the  dendritic  arbors  matches  that  of  the \naxonal  patches,  in  accordance  with  the  anatomical  data.  This  result  confirms  the \ndiversity maximization hypothesis stated in  (Malach,  1994). \n\n2  Orientation  tuning:  a  functional  manifestation \n\nof sam pIing diversity \n\nThe  orientation  columns  in  VI  are  perhaps  the  best-known  example  of functional \narchitecture found  in  the  cortex  (Bubel  and  Wiesel,  1962).  Cortical  maps obtained \nby  optical imaging (Grinvald et  al.,  1986) reveal  that orientation columns are patchy \nrather  then  slab-like:  domains  corresponding  to  a  single  orientation  appear  as  a \nmosaic  of round  patches,  which  tend  to form  pinwheel-like  structures.  Incremental \nchanges  in  the  orientation  of  the  stimulus  lead  to  smooth  shifts  in  the  position  of \nthese  domains.  We  hypothesized  that this smooth variation in  orientation selectivity \nfound in VI originates in patchy projections, combined with diversity in the response \nproperties of neurons sampling from these  projections.  The simulations described  in \nthe  rest  of this section substantiate this hypothesis. \n\nComputer simulations.  The goal of the  simulations was  to  demonstrate  that  a \nlimited number of discretely tuned elements can give rise to a continuum of responses. \nWe  did not try to explain how  the original set  of discrete  orientations can be formed \nby  projections from  the  LGN  to  the  striate  cortex;  several  models for  this step  can \nbe  found  in  the  literature  (Bubel  and  Wiesel,  1962;  Vidyasagar,  1985).2  In  setting \nthe size  of the original discrete orientation columns we followed the notion of a point \nimage  (MacIlwain,  1986),  defined  as  the  minimal  cortical  separation  of cells  with \nnon-overlapping  RFs.  Each  column  was  tuned  to  a  specific  angle,  and  located  at \nan  approximately constant  distance from  another column with  the same orientation \ntuning (we allowed some scatter in the location of the RFs).  The RFs of adjacent units \nwith  the  same  orientation  preference  were  overlapping,  and  the  amount  of overlap \n\n2ln particular, it has been argued (Vidyasagar, 1985) that the receptive fields at the output of the \nLGN are already broadly tuned for a  small number of discrete orientations (possibly just horizontal \nand vertical), and that at the cortical level the entire spectrum of orientations is generated from the \ndiscrete set present in the geniculate projection. \n\n\f120 \n\nKalanit  Grill Spector,  Shimon  Edelman,  Rafael Malach \n\n007 \n\nOOS \n\nOOs \n\n00' \n\n! \n\n003 \n\n00' \n\n001 \n\n0 \n0 \n\n.0 \n\n20 \n\n30 \n\nrunber ~ shlttlng fIlters \n\n'\" \n\n3< \n\n32 \n\n30 \n\nII \n0 28 \n! \n126 \ng .. .. 24 \u2022 \n\n22 \n\n20 \n\n'\u00b70 \n\n.0 \n\n20 \n\nSo \n\nSO \n\n70 \n\n.. \n\nso \n\n30 \n\n'\" \n\nnunber cI shttng tlMlI'1 \n\nFigure  2:  The  effects  of  (independent)  noise  in  the  basis  RFs  and  in  the  steer(cid:173)\ning/shifting coefficients.  Left:  the  approximation error  vs.  the  number of basis RFs \nused  in the linear combination.  Right:  the signal to noise  ratio vs.  the number of ba(cid:173)\nsis  RFs.  The SNR values  were  calculated  as  10 loglO (signal  energy/noise  energy). \nAdding  RFs to the basis increases  the accuracy  of the resultant interpolated  RF. \n\nwas  determined by  the number of RFs incorporated into the network.  The preferred \norientations  were  equally  spaced  at  angles  between  0  and  1r.  The  RFs  used  in  the \nsimulations were  modeled  by  a  product  of a  2D  Gaussian  G 1 ,  centered  at  rj,  with \norientation selectivity G2, and optimal angle Oi:  G(r, rj, 0, Oi)  =  G1(r, rj)G2(O, Oi). \nAccording  to  the  recent  results  on  shiftable/steerable  filters  (Simon celli  et  al., \n1992), a  RF located at ro  and tuned to the orientation ,po  can be obtained by a linear \ncombination of basis  RFs,  as follows: \n\nG(r, ro, 0, ,po) \n\nM-IN-I \n\nL  L  bj(ro)ki(,po)G(r,rj,O,Oi) \nj=O \nM-I \n2: bj(ro)G1(r, rj) 2: ki(,po)G2(O,Oi) \n\ni=O \n\nN-I \n\nj=O \n\ni=O \n\n(1 ) \n\nFrom equation  1 it is  clear  that  the  linear combination is  equivalent  to  an outer \nproduct  of the shifted  and  the steered  RFs,  with  {ki(,pO)}~~1 and  {bj(ro)}~~l de(cid:173)\nnoting  the  steering  and  shifting  coefficients,  respectively.  Because  orientation  and \nlocalization  are  independent  parameters,  the  steering  coefficients  can  be  calculated \nseparately from  the shifting coefficients.  The number of steering coefficients depends \non the polar  Fourier bandwidth of the basis RF,  while  the number of steering filters \nis inversely proportional to the basis RF size  (Grill-Spector et al.,  1995).  In the pres(cid:173)\nence  of noise this minimal basis has to be extended  (see  Figure 2).  The results ofthe \nsimulation for  several  RF sizes  are shown in Figure 3, left.  As  expected,  the number \nof basis  RFs  required  to  approximate a  desired  RF  is  inversely  proportional  to  the \n\n\fDiversity in  the Response Properties  of Cortical Neurons \n\n121 \n\nThe dependency oI1he nlnber d  RF9  a1 the venene. \n\n'. \n\n,5 \n\n2 \n\nvan.,08 \n\n25 \n\n35 \n\nFigure 3:  Left:  error of the steering/shifting approximation for several basis RF sizes. \nRight:  the number of basis  RFs required to achieve a given error for  different  sizes of \nthe basis  RFs.  The dashed  line is  the  hyperbola num  RFs x  size =  const. \n\nsize of the basis  RFs (Figure 3,  right). \n\nSteerability and  biological  considerations.  The  anatomical finding  that  the \ncolumnar \"borders\"  are freely  crossed  by dendritic and axonal arbors (Malach,  1992), \nand the mathematical properties of shiftable/steerable filters  outlined  above suggest \nthat the columnar architecture in VI  provides a basis for  creating a  continuum of RF \nproperties, rather that being a form of organizing RFs in discrete bins.  Computation(cid:173)\nally,  this  may be  possible  if the  input  to neurons  is  a  linear  combination of outputs \nof several  RFs,  as  in  equation  1.  The  anatomical  basis  for  this  computation  may \nbe  provided  by  intrinsic cortical  connections.  It is  known  that long-range (I\"V  1 mm) \nconnections  tend  to link  cells  with  like orientation preference,  while  the  short-range \n(I\"V  400  J.lm)  connections are  made to cells  of diverse  orientation preferences  (Malach \net al.,  1993).  We suggest  that the former provide the inputs necessary  to shift the po(cid:173)\nsition of the desired  RF, while the latter participate in steering the RF to an arbitrary \nangle (see  Grill-Spector et  al.,  1995, for  details). \n\n3  Matching with patchy connections \n\nMany visual tasks require matching between images taken at different  points in space \n(as in binocular stereopsis)  or time (as in  motion processing).  The first  and foremost \nproblem faced  by  a  biological system in solving these  tasks  is  that the images to be \ncompared  are  not  represented  as  such  anywhere  in  the  system:  instead  of  images, \nthere  are  patterns  of activities  of neurons,  with  RFs  that  are  overlapping,  are  not \nlocated  on  a  precise  grid,  and  are  subject  to  mixing by  patchy  projections  in  each \nsuccessive  stage  of processing.  In  this  section,  we  show  that  a  system  composed  of \nscattered  RFs  with  smooth  and  overlapping  tuning  functions  can,  as  a  matter  of \n\n\f122 \n\nKalanit Grill Spector,  Shimon  Edelman,  Rafael Malach \n\nfact,  perform  matching precisely  by  allowing  patchy  connections  between  domains. \nMoreover, the weights that must be given to the various inputs that feed a RF carrying \nout the match are identical to the coefficients  that would be  generated by  a learning \nalgorithm required  to  capture  a  certain  well-defined  input-output relationship  from \npairs of examples. \n\nDOMAIN  A \n\nFigure 4:  Unit  C  receives  patchy  input from  areas A  and  B  which  contain receptors \nwith overlapping RFs. \n\nConsider  a  unit  C,  sampling  two  domains  A  and  B  through  a  Gaussian-profile \ndendritic  patch  equal  in  size  to  that  of the  axonal  arbor  of cells  feeding  A  and  B \n(Figure 4).  The task faced  by unit C is to determine the degree  to which the activity \npatterns in domains A  and  B  match.  Let  <Pjp  be  the response  of the  j'th unit  in A \nto an input x-;': \n\nA. .  = exp{ - Xp  - Xj \n'l'JP \n\n20'2 \n\n( .. \n\n\")2 \n} \n\n(2) \n\nwhere  xj  be  the optimal pattern to which  the j'th unit is  tuned  (the response  Bjp  of \na  unit in B is of similar form).  If, for  example, domains A  and B  contain orientation \nselective  cells,  then xj  would be the optimal combination of orientation and location \nof a  bar stimulus.  For simplicity we  assume  that all the RFs are  of the same size  0', \nthat  unit  C  samples  the  same  number  of neurons  N  from  both  domains,  and  that \nthe input from each  domain to unit C  is  a linear combination of the responses of the \nunits in each  area.  The input  to  C from  domain A,  with x-;,  presented  to the system \nis then: \n\nN \n\nAin = L aj<pjp \n\nj=1 \n\n(3) \n\n\fDiversity  in  the  Response  Properties of Cortical Neurons \n\n123 \n\nThe problem is to find  coefficients {aj} and {bj } such that on a given set of inputs \n{x-;}  the  outputs of domains A  and  B  will  match.  We  define  the matching error  as \nfollows: \n\nEm = t (~a,~,p -~b'8'p)' \n\n(4) \n\nProposition 1  The  desired  coefficients,  minimizing Em,  can  be  generated  by  an  al(cid:173)\ngorithm  trained  to  learn  an  input/output  mapping from  a  set  of examples. \n\nThis proposition can be proved by taking the derivative of Em  with respect  to the \ncoefficients  (Grill-Spector  et  al.,  1995).  Learning  here  can  be  carried  out by  radial \nbasis function (RBF)  approximation (Poggio and Girosi,  1990),  which is particularly \nsuitable for  our purpose,  because  its basis functions  can  be  regarded  as  multidimen(cid:173)\nsional Gaussian  RFs. \n\n4  Summary \n\nOur  results  show  that maximal diversity  of neuronal  response  properties is  attained \nwhen  the  ratio  of dendritic  and  axonal  arbor  sizes  is  equal  to  1,  a  value  found  in \nmany  cortical  areas  and  across  species  (Lund  et  al.,  1993;  Malach,  1994).  Maxi(cid:173)\nmization of diversity  also  leads  to  better  performance  in systems of receptive  fields \nimplementing steerablejshiftable filters,  which  may  be  necessary  for  generating  the \nseemingly  continuous  range  of orientation selectivity  found  in  VI,  and  in ma.tching \nspatially distributed signals.  This cortical organization principle may, therefore,  have \nthe  double  advantage  of accounting  for  the  formation  of  the  cortical  columns  and \nthe associated patchy projection patterns,  and of explaining how systems of receptive \nfields  can  support  functions  such  as  the  generation  of precise  response  tuning  from \nimprecise distributed inputs, and the matching of distributed signals,  a problem that \narises in visual  tasks such  as  stereopsis,  motion processing,  and  recognition. \n\nReferences \n\nGrill-Spector,  K. , Edelman,  S.,  and  Malach,  R.  (1995).  Anatomical origin and com(cid:173)\n\nputational  role  of diversity  in  the  response  properties  of cortical  neurons.  In \nAertsen,  A.,  editor,  Brain  Theory:  biological  basis  and  computational  theory  of \nvision.  Elsevier.  in press. \n\nGrinvald, A., Lieke, T., Frostigand, R., Gilbert, C. , and Wiesel, T. (1986).  Functional \narchitecture  of  the  cortex  as  revealed  by  optical  imaging  of  intrinsic  signals. \nNature,  324:361-364. \n\nRubel,  D.  and  Wiesel,  T .  (1962) .  Receptive fields,  binocular  interactions  and func(cid:173)\n\ntional architecture in the cat's visual cortex.  Journal of Physiology,  160:106-154. \n\n\f124 \n\nKalanit Grill Spector,  Shimon  Edelman,  Rafael Malach \n\nLund,  J.,  Yoshita,  S.,  and  Levitt, J.  (1993).  Comparison of intrinsic  connections  in \n\ndifferent  areas  of macaque cerebral  cortex.  Cerebral  Cortex,  3:148- 162. \n\nMacIlwain, J.  (1986).  Point images in the visual system:  new  interest  in an  old idea. \n\nTrends  in  Neurosciences,  9:354- 358 . \n\nMalach,  R.  (1992) .  Dendritic sampling across  processing  streams  in  monkey striate \n\ncortex.  Journal  of Comparative  Neurobiology,  315:305-312. \n\nMalach,  R.  (1994).  Cortical  columns  as  devices  for  maximizing neuronal  diversity. \n\nTrends  in  Neurosciences,  17:101- 104. \n\nMalach,  R.,  Amir,  Y.,  Harel,  M.,  and  Grinvald,  A.  (1993) .  Relationship  between \nintrinsic connections and functional architecture,revealed by optical imaging and \nin vivo targeted  biocytine injections in  primate striate cortex.  Proceedings  of the \nNational Academy  of Science,  USA,  90:10469- 10473. \n\nMouncastle, V.  (1957).  Modality and topographic properties of single neurons of cat's \n\nsomatic sensory  cortex.  Journal  of Neurophysiology,  20:408-434 . \n\nPoggio,  T.  and  Girosi,  F.  (1990).  Regularization  algorithms for  learning  that  are \n\nequivalent  to multilayer networks.  Science,  247:978- 982. \n\nRockland,  K.  and  Lund,  J.  (1982).  Widespread  periodic intrinsic  connections in  the \n\ntree shrew  visual  cortex.  Science,  215: 1532-1534. \n\nSimoncelli, E.,  Freeman, W., Adelson,  E., and Heeger,  D. (1992).  Shiftable multiscale \n\ntransformations.  IEEE  Transactions  on  Information  Theory,  38:587-607. \n\nVidyasagar,  T.  (1985).  Geniculate  orientation  biases  as  cartesian  coordinates  for \ncortical  orientation  detectors.  In  Models  for  the  visual  cortex,  pages  390- 395. \nWiley,  New  York. \n\n\f", "award": [], "sourceid": 954, "authors": [{"given_name": "Kalanit", "family_name": "Spector", "institution": null}, {"given_name": "Shimon", "family_name": "Edelman", "institution": null}, {"given_name": "Rafael", "family_name": "Malach", "institution": null}]}